Irish establishment moves to making child trafficking easier & far more lucrative
Irish politicians have made two legal changes to help destroy the lives of thousands more children - they knew exactly what they were doing.
The Irish Government just reduced the time that legal migrants of non-EU origin must stay with their sponsoring employer – from twelve months to nine
This change is clearly of no benefit to legitimate migrant workers or legitimate Irish employers
At the same time, new surrogacy laws that permit convicted sex offenders and refugees to enter into paid surrogacy arrangements are to be introduced
Upon examination, both changes seem exclusively designed to benefit the massive Irish human and child trafficking industry, surrogacy profiteers, and the Irish-based paedofile networks that many Irish politicians belong to
Visa-sponsored work permit holders will be allowed change employer sooner, following the passing of new laws by the Irish parliament last week. The Employment Permits Bill 2022 recently cleared the final stages of the Oireachtas was duly signed into law by the Irish president.
Currently, people who come to Ireland on a General Employment Permit must stay with their sponsoring employer for at least 12 months unless there are exceptional circumstances. After those 12 months have passed, a legal immigrant is entitled to make a new application for a permit and can apply to change employers. Work permit holders will now have the right to change employers after a period of nine months have passed. The change is being presented by the usual NGO talking heads as a positive for employers and employees alike.
Of course, for any move to take place a sponsored-migrant would have to find another employer willing to enter into a visa sponsorship arrangement, where many are not set up to do so. Many employers won’t want to hire someone who has left a job after just nine months. Irish government-funded NGO groups have long stated that the current twelve-month arrangement can lead to exploitation and discrimination of migrant workers, as they are forced to stay in with the same employer for at least one year to retain their permit.
Regardless, most sponsored employees won’t want to leave their employer for at least a year as such an early move makes them look disloyal, and doesn’t look great on their CV. In addition to this, the vast (vast) majority of non-EU visa sponsorship cases in Ireland are to corporate employers for critical skills-shortage jobs with a minimum salary of thirty eight thousand euro – workplace abuse just isn’t a problem. Outside of that, if a certain Irish fruit firm is importing workers and abusing them, workers are not going to find another fruit-picking firm to switch visas to anyway, so they can either stick it out or go home – a reduction to nine months isn’t going to make a difference to any migrant who has already been sponsored into a standard employment arrangement.
Established protection mechanisms like the Workplace relations commission are already in place to handle abuse claims, and visas are not suspended by the department of immigration if abuse is claimed to be present, or where a migrant has to leave or suspend their job for those reasons. Migrants are also entitled to claim welfare in those circumstances while searching for a new job. So to clarify, in the common sense world there was absolutely no need for this legal change in the legitimate Irish economic environment.
Commenting on the new laws in a statement to government-funded Irish media outlets, Edel McGinley, Director of the government-funded ‘Migrant Rights Centre of Ireland’, called the changes “a major victory” for migrant workers. Some of the other quotes attributed to her by the government-funded thejournal.ie on the subject were interesting:
“The work permit system has for too long tied a person to one employer and as a result they were easily taken advantage of”…”In our experience restricting a person to one employer has been the biggest factor leading to the cases of gross exploitation of migrant workers that we come across"…“This is a real leap forward in terms of worker rights and recognition, and we hope it paves the way for equal rights for all people who come to Ireland for work.”
These were bizarre statements given the facts listed above: three months will make no difference here in the rare circumstances where abuse is present.
What is quite clear is that this new nine-month arrangement, if it were to have any marginal impact, would actually reduce the numbers of skilled migrant workers migrating into the economy in the future. The reasons for this revolve around risk versus reward for sponsoring employers: the current arrangement of migrant workers being tied to one employer for at least twelve months is an important incentive for hiring businesses to enter the sponsorship arrangement in the first place.
There is a substantial administrative and financial cost involved in sponsoring a non-EU/UK employee, and not a small amount of operational risk. Often employers must wait for an extended period before these new hires can start relative to locally based candidates. And those sponsored employees are much less likely to eventually start in the job itself, for obvious reasons – moving countries and leaving family is a big commitment and this can often lead to changed minds; property prices are insane in Ireland; often other companies can make higher salary offers – these people are active and in-demand job-seekers. Vacant employee seats also cost employers money - and those turnover/vacancy costs escalate as we go higher up the skills ladder. If an employer is guaranteed to have a sponsored worker for only nine months, they will be less likely to go outside the EU given the considerable risks involved.
I mention all of the above to highlight the clear disadvantages this new law presents for legitimate migrants, and for Irish businesses who are competing for specialist international talent. So who was the change really designed to benefit? Could this legal change have anything to do with the almost simultaneous passing of new surrogacy laws on the 26th of June 2024?
Surrogacy, Stephen Donnelly, & Irish Sex offenders
Edel McGinley has been campaigning for years on this non-issue of 12 month working visas. She is also theoretically involved in protecting the rights of migrants and refugees in Ireland as Director of her government funded NGO. She was also part of a Dail committee in 2023 with some of the very worst people in Irish public life which had a stated intent of “Preventing the deprivation of nationality to children born through surrogacy arrangements”.
To rephrase that quote, they were actually ‘working towards allowing the children of refugees to be bought by locals and given Irish citizenship’. Ask yourself why this was a stated goal of a Dail committee: where did the idea come from that refugees should be permitted to enter into financial surrogacy arrangements in Ireland come from in the first place?
The people making these laws surely know that this change would make the children of refugees a much more lucrative product for human traffickers, given the attached Irish-citizenship benefits that would be derived from a surrogacy agreement between an Irish Citizen and a non-EU refugee. Under the new arrangement, human traffickers will no longer have to smuggle children into the country to satisfy the demand for children from the massive Irish paedofile scene (see my article on the Candle of Grade charity for an example of how child-trafficking into Ireland is supported by the Irish establishment). Instead, traffickers now only have to own a non-EU women, or bring them under their control, then help them flee to Ireland to claim refugee status, and then impregnate them for the highest bidder.
Any future legal change that brought this refugee surrogacy possibility into law would obviously be a boon to human traffickers facing the Irish child trafficking market, yet they are now bringing in laws to do just that. Surely the NGO leaders present realised this? And if they didn’t, surely they see it now and will highlight this clear potential for abuse?
The Assisted Human Reproduction bill (AHR) is about to come into effect in Ireland. The minister for health Stephen Donnelly is someone who helped destroy the lives of many children throughout the so-called ‘pandemic’ years and the ‘pandemic’s’ associated lockdowns, masking, and freezing cold classrooms (not to mention the intentionally harmful vaccine program pushed on children against WHO recommendations). For his latest trick, Donnelly also declined to include a proposed amendment that would prevent single men or even convicted sex offenders from entering into surrogacy arrangements with anyone, including refugees. Yes, you read that correctly.
In May 2022, in an exchange between Sharon Keoghan and the former UN Special Rapporteur on the sale and sexual exploitation of children, it was put on the Dail record that there is a major global industry around surrogacy profiteering in general, particularly for women from third world countries where most of the women claiming refugee status will come from. And the above scenarios are just one of many that have now been incentivised by the Irish ruling organised crime syndicate.
To tie in the new nine month visa law explained above, that new law will be useful for front companies to shuffle visa-sponsored women from one corporate entity to the next. Every nine months. Not only are more and more refugees being allowed to access the labour market in Ireland, the new surrogacy laws will allow corporate entities to hire a third world/non-EU woman on a visa for, say, IT related work - bring her into the country to breed her for nine months - then move her on to the next ‘employer’ to breed some more.
To be clear, I’m not saying Edel McGinley of the Irish Migrant council is aware of any of above or below issues, but she really should be at this stage. Perhaps some of her committee colleagues pulled the wool over her eyes. One hopes she would raise these issues as soon as possible in her stated brief of protecting migrants and migrant children who come to or who are born in Ireland. After all, she is the director of the government-funded ‘migrant council of Ireland’. Even the UN has spoken about this issue being a legitimate concern.
So let me lay this all out for the hard of hearing. There is a concerted effort here by certain parties to increase the incentives for human traffickers to bring women into the country under the cover of being refugees, to use them for surrogacy services. There has also been a concerted effort to provide other legislative cover for a number of different scenarios under which this enterprise could successfully take place – that is, legitimate visa sponsorship, which has almost no regulation in this country once the visa has been awarded. These are two new ways to get non-EU women into Ireland to breed valuable children that can then be passed on to literally anyone.
Put simply, there is a concerted establishment effort to facilitate paedofiles and child rapists in Ireland in their efforts to adopt children and abuse them for life, as we seen in this horrific recent case in the United states - one of many such cases. Depraved Irish and Irish-based paedofiles will pay any asking-price to access these children via surrogacy arrangements. Many currently unborn children will be facing into the most horrific of existences thanks to these new legal changes.
Irish politicians (many of whom were on that panel linked above in 2023) are intent on facilitating all of the above because many of them are paedofiles themselves, and they will have access to these children, or at least, cuts of the proceeds. Many of them are also controlled by criminal human trafficking gangs. Many of them are just psychopaths with smiling faces.
Many of these bred children will also be used in the sex-trade, and in compromat exercises facing other Irish political paedofiles and paedofiles in Irish public life in general, to entrap them and thus control them. This is how Ireland works. Many Irish politicians are directly involved in wholesale familial child abuse and were likely abused as children themselves – many are psychopaths. What sounds abhorrent to you is a Saturday night for many of them.
As we found out recently in the film ‘the sound of freedom’ (if we didn’t already know), selling children is the biggest business on earth. That film was incessantly attacked by the global left and political establishment uniparty because it highlighted the realities of an industry that many media and political establishment faces are an integral part of. If they wanted to, the Irish Government could stop it all using the resources of the state. Instead, they create the conditions the trade needs to flourish.
All of the above is what’s really going on, and some of the TDs who were on that committee in 2023 are involved in the enterprise. Most of them know about everything I have explained. Ireland is currently the lowest ranking country in Europe when it comes to efforts to combat human trafficking, according to the US State department (currently the only country in Europe besides Romania at tier two), and has been on that list for three consecutive years.